Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Also their shipbuilding was impressive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ming_treasure_voyages - whole fleets reaching as far as the Red Sea and East Africa.

But then they turned inward.

Some have argued that the reason Europe's industrial revolution took off is that there was no central authority to shut down industrial development and exploration over the whole continent.

> wrong kind of people were getting rich

In Europe, the nobility wasn't powerful enough to shut down the merchants.




Europe's industrial revolution was also profitable, while Ming treasure voyages were expensive and resulted in no profit.

We, too, stopped flying to the Moon for 50 years because it was too expensive.


Not "too expensive", just not prepared to pay that expense.

Obviously the USA had the wealth to continue the Apollo program and follow ons if the will had been there.


By a number of measures China was more advanced than most of the West after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Why the West Rules for Now goes into this in a fair bit of detail. But Europe spiked up again and, once the industrial revolution hit, the growth essentially made everything that went before look like a flatline by comparison.


Saw a chart a while ago, comparing wealth in India/Europe/China.

The three were pretty much in lockstep, Europe slightly ahead, except for the period 600 to 1200 CE, when Europe lagged behind.

Then came the Industrial Revolution, and that's why the West rules, . . . for now.

Jared Diamond's book Guns, Germs, and Steel, also explores this topic.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: