Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why is this project on such a long timeline? I wonder what was the longest critical path in this project plan?


I can see a couple factors:

* To be useful to science, the telescope needs a huge diameter which is more than can be launched so they had to make a folding telescope that can be later unfolded.

* We only get a single chance for success so testing becomes critical. Lot of testing was needed to make sure everything would work out in the end.

* The technology needed was pushing the limits of what we are capable of so lot of R&D needed.


A misunderstanding of 'failure' by the general public.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: