I mean, yes. Keysight's test equipment skews towards the high end in general, and this is their absolute top-of-the-line oscilloscope -- it is quite likely the highest performance oscilloscope available on the market. It costs around $1.3M before you start configuring options.
This isn't a general-purpose instrument. It's intended for engineers debugging systems which use extremely high-speed signalling. Even in a commercial environment, hardware like this would be unusual, and very few people would have access to it.
> Even in a commercial environment, hardware like this would be unusual, and very few people would have access to it.
For most companies it's kind difficult to justify the investment, if they need equipment this accurate at this frequency they will just rent it from a third party Test Lab during hardware verification stages.
The ZVA is an vector network analyzer, not an oscilloscope.
Don't get me wrong, the ZVA is still an extremely impressive piece of engineering, but not even close to what Keysight had achieved with the UXR.
The ZVA is not the same use case as this. The competitor to URX is the teledyne lecroy lab master which also has 110 GHz bandwidth. The difference is that teledyne uses bandwidth interleaving, which keysight argues is inferior (they are probably correct, keysight has some ENOB advantages, however teledyne has other advantages). Tektronix has essentially left the competition for this super high end, they didn't manage to go beyond 70 GHz (which was some years back for all of these)
This isn't a general-purpose instrument. It's intended for engineers debugging systems which use extremely high-speed signalling. Even in a commercial environment, hardware like this would be unusual, and very few people would have access to it.