Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They just don't want it to be repackaged with patches that cause them to receive support requests for issues which are essentially a distro fault


They don't want you forking it for that purpose, either.

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126326

Is it technically open source? Yes. Is it spiritually open source? No. Is it arrogance and poor management? Along with many ways this project is run, absolutely yes.


Use it but not modify it? With that attitude it can't even be classified as Open Source.

Hard pass.


Firefox does the same thing. By your definition, it is not open source either. They don't care if you use a different name (e.g. Fennec) though.


Too bad. If they intentionally make it hard for people to make a software follow their distro conventions, be it immutability or reproceability, then they shouldn't be too surprised that forcing the software to behave properly could cause side-effects.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: