> Bayer pattern sensors were more common in DSLRs, because they were an extension of 35mm film, and you had to have a single, flat imaging device to work with film optics.
A lot of people were shooting video with their DSLRs before more dedicated devices became available (myself included). Is there actually a fundamental difference between a DSLR and video camera at that point?
>A lot of people were shooting video with their DSLRs before more dedicated devices became available
I doubt it. DSLRs didn't have video shooting capabilities till quite later on (late 00's?) compared to phones and point and shoot digital cameras which did much earlier.
A lot of people were shooting video with their DSLRs before more dedicated devices became available (myself included). Is there actually a fundamental difference between a DSLR and video camera at that point?