Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's my point, that `echo .gitignore > .gitginore` as advertised as "a cool hack" in the article can lead to disasters.



I can't see how you'd interpret this as "advertising a cool hack."

The entire original article:

I initialised a new Git repository, and added a .gitignore file instructing git to ignore .gitignore:

git init . echo ".gitignore" > .gitignore git status

And the result:

On branch trunk No commits yet nothing to commit (create/copy files and use "git add" to track)

Therefore, we can see Git ignores .gitignore because its in .gitignore, which means it didn’t ignore .gitignore for instructions.

Is any of this informative, surprising, or useful? … Absolutely.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: