Serious question how exactly did you come up with the idea for selling what is essentially public available info then convincing people to buy it? Is it just rate limit removal. Why do people pay for what is essentially public info. I see john deer on customers list again just blows my mind. Out of all the companies in the world you guys were like yeah lets call john deer and see if they need better ip reg info LOL? I've used a lot of data broker services in my life and 9/10 times the area we were hoping they could provide better data is the exact thing we couldn't figure out and they are also missing it.
This comes from a place of amazement not some sort of passive aggressive thing It really astounds me just how bad a I am at judging potential markets. Maybe you could give hope to some of us soul sucked 9-5ers looking to escape. I'm really glad you figured something out.
We build our data sets on top of publicly available information (whois, BGP, rdns etc), but also combine it with lots of data we collect ourselves (ping & traceroute data from our probe network of over 100 locations). And then we do a whole lot of work with that data to produce our actual data sets. And there's a whole lot of work that goes into continuing to improve them, evaluate them, and ensure they're consistent etc. It's not easy!
And that's just producing the data. Making it available via a low latency and highly available API that handles over 100 billion requests per month requires some work, along with supporting data downloads in various file formats, and integrations into all of the various platforms that our customers want to use our data with.
And that's just on the engineering side of things!
But I'd say that even if our data was publicly availble (and to be fair some geolocation data is available for free - although it's generally not very accurate, and we also have other data sets beyond just geolocation) - there's still lots of value is making that accessible, easy to use and understand, and helping your customers get back to solving thier own problems while you worry about solving that piece for them.
We used ipinfo for a while because we didn't know much about the space, they had good SEO, the data appeared to be high quality, and it was easy to use. We were pretty happy with it!
We ran into some minor problems along the way, mostly around cost, and eventually had to switch to something else. We still don't know much about the space and the main thing that stood out about our new provider is that it is cheaper but the data seems to be of lower quality.
I can’t speak for ipinfo, but in comparing free vs commercial data only very basic geolocation by IP is public. This might be due to the IP block allocation (country/region/city) or handy things like ISPs that use geo names in the host name. Many other ranges are opaque blocks or allocated to something like a reseller, etc.
Getting finer grained data down to smaller groups blocks is harder and not public.
Packaging it up into easy to consume (normalized) is yet another layer of work.
This comes from a place of amazement not some sort of passive aggressive thing It really astounds me just how bad a I am at judging potential markets. Maybe you could give hope to some of us soul sucked 9-5ers looking to escape. I'm really glad you figured something out.