> For the developer working on the change, or for the reviewer + everyone that comes after them looking at your commit (which can include your future self)?
Both. I don't really follow what you're getting at, I think we're in agreement? confused
Yes we are; I thought you were advocating for larger commits since they're too difficult to break apart into logically independent pieces, but it seems I just misunderstood what you wrote the first time I read it.
Both. I don't really follow what you're getting at, I think we're in agreement? confused