Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The person the officer is interacting with might be concerned in a very different way about what they say to a police officer, vs what they say to a police officer while a random or perhaps not random at all third party is recording. 8 ft seems like a reasonable cutoff.

But something needs to be done about the abuse potential of another officer walking towards the recording person, repeating "eight foot rule! eight foot rule!" to continuously push back the recording person so that their colleagues can proceed unwatched.




As I mentioned, the article clarifies that the law only applies in the case that an officer is interacting with a third party.

A cop walking towards you is clearly interacting with you, not a third party, thus the law would not apply.


Thanks, missed that detail. Surprisingly well thought out then!


The second part of your comment is the exact intention of this law! That’s exactly how it’s supposed to work.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: