Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> If it's nonsense, then why censor it?

Because people believe the nonsense and then storm the capital, and/or support overturning democratic elections in order to allow would-be dictators to seize power.

Misinformation can have a serious and deeply negative impact on the world, and the general public is clearly not immune to it.




Specious argument. First of all, the democrats did a lot of calling of elections into question, and so have republicans, and so what? Second, there has been an enormous amount of violence in the U.S. in the past several years, and the vast majority of that did not happen on 2021-01-06. Third, "storming" of capitols is a thing that has happened plenty in the U.S., and fairly recently too, once in the past year alone in Georgia, and in Wisconsin in 2010, and so on.


Your argument seems to boil down to: “bad things have happened before, so bad things aren’t bad”.

1. In a close election, contesting it or demanding a recount is fine and sane. Step aside once the results of that process are in. Trying to discredit the entire system with a mountain of bullshit and overthrow an election when it is overwhelmingly clear that it did not go in your favor is an incredibly dangerous road for us to go down. The two practices are incomparable.

2. I can’t understand this argument. Are you saying that 1.6.21 must compose a minimum of 51% of all violence in the US over the past several years before it qualifies as an issue?

3. Presidents inciting their supporters to violently overthrow elections that did not go in their favor is not a thing that has happened plenty recently nor should it ever.


I'm saying we don't do prior restraints on speech in the U.S. Law enforcement can take care of the rest.


And YouTube is saying that it is not obligated to carry content that convinces stupid people to do dangerous things. Doing so causes chaos, which ultimately reduces advertising spend and hurts profits.


So storming the US Capitol is okay, and to be expected in the future? What will you say when Democrats do it? Will it be insurrection in that case? I mean, explicitly stating the purpose is to overturn the election. When does it become insurrection, exactly? Does it not count when 'patriots' are doing it to 'save the country'?


Some would claim religion is misinformation and causes a lot of problems… they’d say the only thing going for it is that a lot of people believe it.


We have hundreds of years of debate and experience with freedom of speech, and I think the conclusions are clear.

In this specific debate, if "misinformation" is forbidden, whoever gets to decide what is classified as "misinformation", will control society.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: