No because you're still thinking about it in terms of personal economics when actually it's about power and violence.
If you must sell your labor to pay for the requirements of life, then you're vulnerable to being denied access to that transaction and will suffer the consequences.
The marxist analysis is limited in some ways but in this one it is a clarifying advantage. It doesn't matter, for some purposes, how much you earn if you must earn it to survive.
If you've earned enough that you can buy a bakery on a whim, or stop working entirely, then your economic interests are rarely if ever going to align with people forced to sell their labor and so you've partially or completely transitioned to something else, I think.
If you must sell your labor to pay for the requirements of life, then you're vulnerable to being denied access to that transaction and will suffer the consequences.
The marxist analysis is limited in some ways but in this one it is a clarifying advantage. It doesn't matter, for some purposes, how much you earn if you must earn it to survive.
If you've earned enough that you can buy a bakery on a whim, or stop working entirely, then your economic interests are rarely if ever going to align with people forced to sell their labor and so you've partially or completely transitioned to something else, I think.