Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm sure nobody would argue against that in principle, but the reality in most countries is that society is willing to pay for 1 to 1.5 FTE per 30 children. And even with such numbers, education is typically already one of the top public expenditures. How much child observation and taylored (vs mass manufactured) education can be done within these constraints?



The Montessori schools went to had about 1.2 FTEs per 30 children and that worked. I think it's generally a question of putting the effort where it matters the most.

As far as I understand it, in non-Montessori schools, a lot of teacher effort is spent on the wrong things, like grading, anti-cheating measures, very strict lesson orders, and so on.


Yup, most public schools are a means of instilling a fear of authority, a means for providing cheap day care, and finally a means of education, in that order of priority.


Most US states pay more than $1200 per child per month.

Somehow, these private schools offer better education for less money than that.

We need to stop funding schools and start funding children.

Let them take that money to the place where they learn the best. I’d bet teachers would be paid better and bad teachers would be removed much more quickly. I’d also conjecture that teachers would enjoy their jobs much more


Private schools select their students. Public schools don’t. So naturally the former perform better than the latter.


Good public schools select their students. This has become politically unpalatable (e.g. Lowell High School in San Francisco) for many on the left.


> Somehow, these private schools offer better education for less money than that.

They don't have as many "problem" kids who get one-on-one dedicated personnel, self-contained classrooms with two staff just for ten kids, et c. Nor do their regular classroom teachers have to put up with as much disruption, both because there's less to begin with and because they can kick kids out much more easily than public schools can.

And even "private schools" is too broad a category. Most private schools are no better, or even worse, than nearby public schools. Often this is because their appeal is religious, first, over education. However, many of the secular or more gently-religious ones that look better on paper may actually deliver worse education, but look superior purely due to selection bias—this can be revealed if their students move to public schools. They don't always come in and breeze through because they were ahead (to be clear, that does sometimes happen if the school was good!), instead they may be badly behind, despite having had good grades at their expensive private school.


IMO/IME it should be closer to 1 FTE per 15 students. If we actually cared about the quality of our future.


We struggle finding teachers for the current staffing needs. It seems almost impossible to find 1.5-2x as many qualified teachers.


I don't know what society you are referring to, but in the US, that is no where near the case. Here are some numbers of teacher to student ratios in the US- https://www.publicschoolreview.com/average-student-teacher-r...

Those numbers don't include other Full Time Employees like aids, tutors, and other support staff that work with students.


Can you clarify if you mean "tailored" or if you are making Taylorism into a verb "taylored"? Since it appears so close in your comment to "mass manufacturing" I'm having difficulty distinguishing the meaning.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: