Replacing them with coal would have been a good idea, at least as far as Russia is concerned, since it’s a local source of energy. In reality it was, indeed, natural gas and renewables.
Bringing Thunberg into this discussion serves no purpose except making conservatives giggle because they love hating her. She had nothing to with the decision, and being anti-nuclear isn’t what she’s known for.
Northstream 2 was, indeed, a terrible idea. But it never became operational and therefore does not affect the current situation.
Replacing them with coal would have been a good idea, at least as far as Russia is concerned
Did Russia have some involvement in Germany's nuclear power infrastructure? I'm not aware of that, but interested to know more.
Bringing Thunberg into this discussion serves no purpose except making conservatives giggle because they love hating her. She had nothing to with the decision, and being anti-nuclear isn’t what she’s known for.
Sure, it was probably a bit forced. I wouldn't have chosen to bring her up. Either way, her anti-nuclear stance is now a relatively widely publicized recent event; I don't see that GP did something particularly wrong in referencing it.
Northstream 2 was, indeed, a terrible idea. But it never became operational and therefore does not affect the current situation.
Huh? It's directly related to the current situation.
Bringing Thunberg into this discussion serves no purpose except making conservatives giggle because they love hating her. She had nothing to with the decision, and being anti-nuclear isn’t what she’s known for.
Northstream 2 was, indeed, a terrible idea. But it never became operational and therefore does not affect the current situation.