Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Pragmatic rulemaking for large numbers of people also needs to take into account the fact that the rule will naturally be viewed as a loose guideline by some people, and even as a thing to be defied for its own sake by others. Setting the limit stricter than the actual desired behavior can push average behavior closer to the target.



> Setting the limit stricter than the actual desired behavior can push average behavior closer to the target.

Absolutely not, at least in the context of speed limits. Where I live, most of the speed limits are at least 15mph lower than they should be (why is a 6 lane road 30mph???), so you get:

* people who follow the speed limit exactly: 30mph

* people who follow the speed limit the road was designed for: 45mph

* people who see the limit as a "limit:" 25mph

It's a mess. Roads need to be designed to the desired speed limit. Don't make a 6-lane straight road 30mph; people unfamiliar with the area will assume the speed limit's 50% higher than it is, and people from the area will feel like they're going incredibly slow.

In short, it should be uncomfortable to go >= 20mph over by design if you want people to follow your speed limits.


> Setting the limit stricter than the actual desired behavior can push average behavior closer to the target

I hate this so much. Selective enforcement only serves to enable overzealous enforcement against unpopular and disenfranchised groups.

One does one small thing wrong and they can then tack a large handful of other charges that would never otherwise be enforced. It's disgusting.

Make the rules things that should actually be rules. Enforce them as written. The end.


Yes, that's a great reason why laws made for humans may not be perfect when applied strictly to machines.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: