This is it. Inverse is a property of functions or other relational operators, not "static" individual objects. You need a direction in order to invert it.
I think we’re on the same page. The point I was trying to make is that reciprocal/multiplicative inverse in every day use seems like it’s a property of a number and not of a function only because most people just assume that the function we’re inverting is multiplication. The comment I was replying to missed that.
The multiplicative inverse of a number n can be seen as the inverse of the function that multiplies its input by n. That is, the inverse of multiplication by n is multiplication by 1/n.
Similarly, the additive inverse of a number m is the inverse of the function that adds m to its input.