The article makes a pretty clear point that the go interfaces it talks about aren't as simple as they seem.
The limitations of the language result in interfaces that are pretty easy to misuse due to unenforceable invariants, and not in theoretical ways either, which I think is the opposite of simple.
The limitations of the language result in interfaces that are pretty easy to misuse due to unenforceable invariants, and not in theoretical ways either, which I think is the opposite of simple.