Interestingly, people are apparently willing to pay $1500 per month to forgo using search engines [0], implying this is what the service is worth to them. I guess here you're asking for price on privacy, as Google is already free to use.
edit: I guess even the range of answers here, compared to implied value of the service, is an indication how much people (me included) value their data.
I think the wording in your post is wrong - That economist article says people would want to be paid $1,500 if they had to sacrifice access to a search engine (not that people would pay to sacrifice access).
edit: I guess even the range of answers here, compared to implied value of the service, is an indication how much people (me included) value their data.
[0] https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/04/25/how-much...