Are you against private property all together?

If not, where do you draw the line? Is a private villa acceptable? A private golf course? A hill? A small island?

Can I decide who enters my 220 square meters apartment?

I'm against the super rich, I think tax brackets on the high end should be much higher.

That’s not the point, you told me that you are not fine with a whole peninsula being owned by the same entity.

My question is: where do you draw the line?

Can someone own a 300 sq meters house? A castle? A golf course? A small island?

300 sqm yes, a castle yes, a golf course yes, a small island no.

I also just don't like the church, so there's double the hate at a super rich church.

Well, I suppose the last sentence kind of betrays your bias.