Edit: it looks like your account has been using HN primarily for ideological and religious arguments. We ban accounts that do that (https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...), because it destroys what this site is supposed to be for.

I don't particularly want to ban you, but you've been doing this so consistently that I don't think we have much choice, especially since this problem has been going on for years:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24256558 (Aug 2020)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21368015 (Oct 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16494736 (March 2018)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16349201 (Feb 2018)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10916584 (Jan 2016)

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

  ----- original comment: -------

Please don't take HN threads further into generic ideological flamewar. That's just what we're trying to avoid here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...

The concept that sexual tension/activity and a spiritual life are at odds or mutually exclusive is itself a bias and presumption.

For most religions this is a well established fact.

As for every spiritual/faith decision you are free to think otherwise, but calling it a bias seems very ungenerous.

It's about as good a "fact" as other "well established fact[s]" in most religions, i.e. not a fact at all, but merely a strong tradition/assertion from authority.

Still not a bias, but a consequence of a system of values.