Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No. It is not obvious. That's the whole point of this discussion.



It’s not obvious? So there is a chance “that’s beautiful” means that the person showing him the painting is beautiful? I’m mystified.


> So there is a chance “that’s beautiful” means that the person showing him the painting is beautiful?

No, but I think the choice of adjective is important. Suppose instead of saying "That's a beautiful painting" I said "That's a masterful painting".

The sentence structure is the same. The adjective is still modifying "painting". I'm still saying the painting is good. But the word I chose more directly implies a judgement of the artist: I am describing the painting as the product of a master painter.

I get the same impression from hearing "stupid idea". Stupid is a description of intelligence, thinking ability, aptitude: attributes which lie with the idea's originator, not with the idea itself.


You wouldn't say "that's a stupid person" unless you were talking about a 3rd person


How is that not obvious? Do you hold that position?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: