Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

And yet they destabilized things by adding the deprecation/trying to get rid of it. And what even was the point of that?



They<the package maintainer> ≠ They<the committee>


They also mentioned how this could happen at the end of the article.

In the end they are working on a distro with certain ideals and this illustrates how they can achieve things with their ideals in mind.


Only in unstable


They destabilize it less than other packaging ecosystems.

I tried Manjaro the other day -- out of the box, wake from sleep was broken, bluetooth was broken, and 3/3 printers were broken. I eventually got sleep working with an older kernel version, I got bluetooth working with config file hacking, and I got the printers working with CUPS wrangling -- but on Ubuntu, all of this Just Worked for me.

That's the point of it.


I don't see how deprecating "which" helps any of that, or any stability in general.


On Debian "unstable".




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: