I think it's better to be a bit more charitable here indeed.
I also found it striking how the post is emphasizing how important transparency in asking questions is which might or might not reveal the intelectual qualities of the person asking, but then failing to be that transparent towards both the clerk and the reader of the blog post about the internal thought process.
If one would like people to learn, enlighten them. :-)
I have encountered both, I'm sort of leaning towards being charitable since the "just asking questions" crowd tends not to write articles about their behaviour!
That lack of transparency seems to be a theme. I have difficulty with blood draws as well and I have never encountered a health care professional that didn't immediately switch to "ok, which arm is usually best" mode.
I've seen people getting a blood draw that the nurse wasn't willing to listen to. They'd tell them what usually happens, and how it goes best, and the nurse would ignore them.
In the end, every single one of the patients was correct. Anyone who typically had problems with blood draws knew their problems well.
Yes, most nurses listen. But there are enough out there that don't that I've seen it multiple times.
I've said nurses, but I don't actually know their professions.
> I've seen people getting a blood draw that the nurse wasn't willing to listen to. They'd tell them what usually happens, and how it goes best, and the nurse would ignore them.
Fair, it could just be my experience as a middle aged, white male coming into play here.
I also found it striking how the post is emphasizing how important transparency in asking questions is which might or might not reveal the intelectual qualities of the person asking, but then failing to be that transparent towards both the clerk and the reader of the blog post about the internal thought process.
If one would like people to learn, enlighten them. :-)