The distribution of IQ and race outside the school have 0 to do with the gifted programs acceptance. This is not systematic racism. The children are experiencing systemic racism elsewhere which is presenting itself here.
What you just stated was actual racism, that other populations are unable to achieve what the Asian students have accomplished, so the program gives them an unfair advantage
Four-year olds are experiencing systematic racism?
Asians kids do better then whites. Racism against whites? Is that because we live in an Asian-centered society where white folk are marginalized? Asians keeping the white man down? Do we need affirmative action for white people? I think that is what Harvard is doing!
It looks like the next NYC mayor will be a black man, so he might be able to keep the "G&T" program going without being accused of racism.
>Four-year olds are experiencing systematic racism?
I'd like to hear a different reason they aren't testing as well then? Or do Asians just test better then other races...?
>whites*
Oh boy, looks like I struck a nerve there. If any student isn't testing well enough to enter then that's how it is. Good someone else has that chance. I wouldn't have a problem if there were no white people in it as long as everyone is testing against the same criteria.
>It looks like the next NYC mayor will be a black man, so he might be able to keep the "G&T" program going without being accused of racism.
I accused you of racist commentary and logic, not the mayor. And if he said what you did, it would be racist as well, regardless of their color, which is not a qualifier on the capability of being racist.
What you just stated was actual racism, that other populations are unable to achieve what the Asian students have accomplished, so the program gives them an unfair advantage