Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Both of which are useful for verifying mathematical predictions.


Like that the digits of pi look a lot like the output of a random number generator? I don't think that prediction is seriously in dispute.



But generating yet more empirical data that it still seems pretty random out to digit n does nothing to advance us to a proof that pi is normal.


I'm not sure about that. Maybe there is a very unlikely pattern somewhere around the n-th digit?


You could find a sequence of 1000 zeroes in the decimal expansion of pi and it would do nothing to prove or refute the idea that pi is normal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: