I gave you all weekend -- Friday, Saturday, and Sunday -- and you didn't reply with actual evidence. So, let's actually see what Christian philosophers have given us.
For starters, they all assume Jehovah exists, or seek to prove he exists. However, we have falsifications for most of the claims of Jehovah:
* Egyptology disproves the Exodus
* The Documentary Hypothesis disproves inspiration of the holy texts
* Quantum mechanics disproves omnipotence and omniscience
So the field of Christian philosophy is built upon sand which has already been washed away; the foundations already collapsed. How about the main philosophers?
* Aquinas just parroted Aristotle
* Augustine claimed that war can be justified and that souls exist
* Erasmus didn't really say anything of note
* Ockham gave us tools for breaking out of Christianity!
The main contribution of Christian philosophy to the rest of philosophy is the confirmation that Jehovah is an epistemic dead end.
> I gave you all weekend -- Friday, Saturday, and Sunday
That's quite generous of you. In the spirit of charity I'll reciprocate and then some. I'm going to give you the rest of your life to learn why love of God and love of wisdom are duals. Don't worry, given your obvious philosophical immaturity I don't expect you to figure it out anytime soon, but I honestly hope that you do in good time. A good place to start would be a deeper study of the three normative sciences: ethics, aesthetics, and logic. Respectively they can be thought of as the sciences of what is good, what is beautiful, and what is true. Pay particular attention to their necessary premises. As with all human understanding, they are subject to confusion, so be very sure to keep your thoughts both clear and distinct.
As for your particular examples, they are one and all either nonsense or irrelevant. One thing that Aristotle taught us is that there are persons who cannot be educated, only persuaded. Try not to be one of them.
