> I think you know on its face that’s not even remotely equivalent to what we’re talking about here

I did not know. The phrase "complete control over monetary policy" has a very specific meaning and I stand by my response as a counterexample to that meaning.

And I don't think this is an unreasonable misunderstanding! People do worry about Bitcoin w.r.t monetary policy, a future of "hyperbitcoinization" where the world runs off a deflationary currency seems undesirable, to say the least.

If that is not what you intended then even given your clarification here I'm still not sure what you meant to say with that phrase.