Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> the developer didn't even bother making a binary because they don't want to build it for 5+ different packaging formats

No snark intended, but how much did you pay for the software?




How can snark not be intended?

The point of the statement wasn't to badmouth developers for not making a Linux binary, it was to criticize the state of application deployment on Linux being so terrible that a developer didn't want to bother making a binary for it. That's true regardless of the cost of the software. Linux Desktop doesn't get to be all "please use me, I'm great!" and "well, what do you want for free?" at the same time.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: