Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's not that simple. The gold standard basically established an international monetary union, similar to the Euro today.

In such a setting, long-term trade imbalances cannot be balanced out by exchange rate adjustments, so there is a very real danger that countries are drained of money by running net imports in the long term. While this then prevents the country from net importing even more - which is only fair - it also reduces the purchasing power of the country's population internally.

The circulation of money is slowed, causing unemployment and the very bizarre situation where people cannot afford to buy desired XYZ, while at the same time there are involuntarily unemployed producers of XYZ. Everybody's unhappy, simply because the social construct of money ties their hands.

By decoupling from the gold standard, countries left what was effectively a currency union, which enabled them to restart internal circulation.

This is also the choice that Greece has right now, which this supposed "smartest man" does not, or for ideological reasons refuses to, see: leave the currency union to restart internal circulation of a new currency.




We went off the gold standard in 1914. There was a minor depression in 1920, but the government did nothing and it resolved itself. In 1929, the government decided to abandon that policy and took action, and by 1933 the use of gold as money in the USA was forbidden by executive order.

When you criminalize the wealth of the country, it is hard to blame people's use of that wealth for the problem. By 1933 it was literally a crime for money (in the form of gold) to circulate, and much of it was sent overseas to hide it.


Starting a new currency is only an option if they restructure also the debt. Having a new currency and owing the money in euros won't help much.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: