(Can't reply to the other comment)

> Reddit has 10x the traffic because it's free.

Reddit acquired more traffic because it's free, true. But now, they aren't looking to acquire more traffic. They're looking for more revenue.

One way to get that revenue is to allow already existing content creators to charge for a part of the content.

I think that would not only encourage better content but would bring in other users and generate good revenue.

> One way to get that revenue is to allow already existing content creators to charge for a part of the content.

Brave can do that for reddit and other social media sites now [1]

[1] https://support.brave.com/hc/en-us/articles/360030752872-Whi...

Reddit's model is based on unpaid moderators managing most of the site. There's already controversy around a few moderators controlling all the large communities, karma farming and behind the scenes deals. Introducing money into the mix will just result in even more abuse as moderators try to take their own cut. It's a very messy eco-system that money will just make even messier.

And Substack. And Reddit has 10x their traffic.

Reddit has 10x the traffic because it's free.

> moderators

I suggest to compensate creators not moderators.

Reddit moderators do not support self-promotion [1]. They won't moderate posts where OP is being paid and they aren't.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/6bj5de/state_of_sp...

If you think moderators won't take advantage of their position to get a cut of that money then you're living in fantasy land. Or just sell their accounts to others who will do that.