This worries me because I "just don't get it". If I worked at medium I would expect to have zero input on editorial decisions (unless I was hired as an editor). The CEO publishing some fluff about not reopening old wounds is something to ignore (like most CEO messages), not something to interpret as a personal attack. It's doubly ironic that a message about assuming good intent is immediately assumed to have bad intent. What is up with people today? What am I missing?!