If you are someone who is active on Twitter, your thoughts about how important Twitter is are biased by your engagement with it. None of the actual people I know and talk to in real life harbor any sort of extremist views one way or another. Literally none of them ever mention Twitter in daily conversation. (And many of them are software devs.)
IMO their statements are amplified by things like national media because of their extremism; the extremism generates strong feelings (whether positive or negative), and strong feelings leads to more eyes on the media for longer. That doesn't mean the people consuming the media also have those extremist beliefs.
> If you are someone who is active on Twitter, your thoughts about how important Twitter is are biased by your engagement with it.
I don't have Twitter.
> Literally none of them ever mention Twitter in daily conversation. (And many of them are software devs.)
Network effects do not cause or force you to acknowledge a source. They merely require you to trust the mental gymnastics of the person who communicated the idea to you.
> That doesn't mean the people consuming the media also have those extremist belief
Generally the people adopting will adopt bits an pieces, this is what I described as "decay".
IMO their statements are amplified by things like national media because of their extremism; the extremism generates strong feelings (whether positive or negative), and strong feelings leads to more eyes on the media for longer. That doesn't mean the people consuming the media also have those extremist beliefs.