I'm afraid I don't trust their unspecified 'cash equivalents' which are mostly not cash or anything close. So I think the title is justified and not in any way a distortion of their position. Here is some more detail on the breakdown and this unspecified 'commercial paper':
Yeah, this is far less bad than I thought it would be. I did indeed expect a few %s to be actually backed by something of value. So please change the title.
“Commercial paper, in fact, formed the majority of its cash and cash equivalents category, with a 65% share. Fiduciary deposits formed 24% of the category, reverse repo notes 3.60%, treasury bills about 3%, and actual cash only 3.87%.“
Can someone who knows money market funds comment on who the commercial paper counterparties could be?
You can see every counterparty for the fund clearly listed and the dollar amount/date of maturity. Surely an above board holdings vehicle like Tether would publish similar disclosures right?
The stablecoin realm has a long way to go. At least Tether set the bar low.
Wasn't the marketing at the beginning that Tether was a 1:1 Tether:USD ratio? When did they officially announce they were changing to a tokenized asset fund?
Also where is the proof by Tether that indeed, this tokenized asset is more stable than USD?
Given pas doubts about tether management, the more important number is what % of the tether issued is backed at all, now how it is backed. The transparency report [1] shows that they have 0.2% more assets that liabilities (in USD) which gives me more confidence than anything else.
Yes, and as soon as there is a bank run the bank stops giving people their money. Just like what will happen if everyone wants their tethers in USD at the same time.
Tether is in fact not a bank, though? It is a service that in theory ports USD to block chains for ease of transaction. The last thing I would want for such a service would be to treat my money like it was a deposit at a non-FDIC insured investment bank.
I’m bearish on Tether too, but the 76% backing in cash and cash equivalents is a far different picture compared to only focusing on the 3-4% cash.