Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why would Apple go through the effort of adding support for booting alternative OS's on M1 Macs and then stand in the way of implementing drivers for the hardware? That doesn't make a lot of sense, IMHO. Especially considering Apple could have gone the exact same path as iOS devices, which is a heavily locked-down platform that shares a lot in common.



A platform for amateur XNU kernel research was required, since the only other one besides the Mac is the Security Research iPhone (which is specifically not for amateurs). All of Apple’s documentation (of which there is little) and the boot loader design itself (what with the blessing process for a secondary drive being to install a tiny XNU partition with the bootloader app), point to the process being specifically designed for loading different versions of macOS. Any ability to install Linux (or Windows) is at this point coincidental.


Perhaps that's true. From what I read it shipped in a non-working state (manuals were there, but not some utilities were not), and I recall Apple engineers came out on Twitter saying it was being worked on and included it post-launch in macOS betas, even incorporating feedback. I believe Apple did tease at least Windows, maybe Linux in marketing, but I could be mistaken..

Either way, going after OS developers would be an extremely bad look for Apple, especially when they could just as easily disable the feature, or not have bothered finishing the implementation (or done it completely differently) after news of the Linux porting efforts started to spread (especially the Corellium public demo running Ubuntu).


Which team is "they", and are "they" communicating with every other team?


[flagged]


What are you talking about?

Nobody here said about Apple "directly upstreaming code to Linux to support M1".

Parent said "adding support for booting alternative OS's on M1 Macs", which Apple did do.


What are _you_ talking about? Apple has never directly supported both directly through software support or otherwise, support for booting anything else but macOS on bare-metal M1.


Not at all true. There's lots of code in macOS to support installing a different OS.


Maybe your feeble brain couldn't read what I said. I said M1, not macOS as a whole. This discussion in about M1, think again. I can guarantee you will find nothing pointing in that direction for M1. Go ahead, look.


Maybe this an option that’s in place just in case Apple decides to license the chip/boards to one or more OEM’s.

OEM licensing makes sense for a SOC, plus the more the chip sells the lower the price per unit, so Apple would make money on the license, and lower their costs.


The support is in the OS. It is there to allow you to install other OSes.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: