Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1 - Qt is not an OS SDK. Apparently you missed that part of my comment.

2 - Qt has been migrating away from pure C++, again you also missed pure from my comment, modern Qt applications are written in Qt Quick, a JavaScript dialect, with underlying components written in C++.

C++ Widgets have hardly changed since Qt 4, other than being updated to the underlying Qt infrastructure.



1. QT is cross platform.

2. QT not moving away from pure C++.

C++ apps always been more responsive than java swing and electron.


Again, read my comment, very carefully, then you migth get it.

Afterwards go learn how to create a GUI for macOS, iOS, Android, ChromeOS, Windows, WebOS (as shipped by LG) or even Fuchsia, using only their SDKs and nothing else.

As for Qt not moving away from pure C++, go use it with pure C++ on iOS, Android and embedded devices.

Maybe you will get it, but I am not so sure.


QT is not moving away from pure C++. QT using QML for front end now and for backend you have to use C++.

Please see this commend by Ivan,

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/s0mhf/qt_5_moving_away...

> Afterwards go learn how to create a GUI for macOS, iOS, Android, ChromeOS, Windows, WebOS (as shipped by LG) or even Fuchsia, using only their SDKs and nothing else.

Why use native SDK when there is QT?

The same can be said for Java. Why use Swing when there is native SDK?

Ahahhaa

The way you treat C++ is unfair.


So you really don't get it.

Java is only part of Android OS SDK, you are the one bring Swing into the picture.

WHAT MAINSTREAM OS HAS QT ON THEIR SDK?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: