Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Patents were made for a time before ubiquitous multinational corporations. If there are multiple sources of truth and markets for what is protected invention, then it greatly dilutes the power of that patent. This ends up hamstringing the countries most dependent on patenting to encourage innovation because we are still beholden to foreign interest who file their patents with the USPO or sell to an American troll. The US is the most fastidious in their preservation of patent law despite its many flaws and this is why we will lose out most in the global turning against protected invention.



All developing nations ignore international copyright, trademark, and patent IP rights. The US did it back in the late 19th century, other nations in the early 20th, Asian nations in the late 20th century. What is happening now is nothing new.

China is now starting to enforce IP rights because as they move up the industry maturity scale, the rights become more important.

IP rights only become relevant to developed nations, where manufacturing and other primary/secondary industries become less important than service industries.

There is no "global turning against protected invention".

There is "developing vs developed nations ongoing opposing interests".


I believe you'll find that ubiquitous multinational corporations do indeed outdate the patent, by a couple hundred years.


Ubiquitous as in many? or just a few colonizing the world?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: