This has been discussed before, I believe, back when someone notified Facebook that a page violates copyrights. FB took down that page without checking for facts and told the owner of the page that he has to resolve the issue with the one that raised the complaint.
Even if that would be the case now, how does Facebook assumes that the protesters can settle with the Goverment of Macedonia about the pages when they're still in the streets?
One of the reasons why I have not visited Facebook since about a year now. I do not want to hand over control of my life to some company feeling fit to do with my data what they want at any time.
Open Letter to Facebook
Posted on June 16, 2011 by tanja
Re: Protests against Policy Brutality in Macedonia (June 2011)
Dear Facebook,
We are writing to express our concern over the swift deletion policy that has been imposed on the facebook pages and events that we as participants in a protest against policy brutality in Macedonia are currently dealing with. We have been made aware by the press secretary for the Ministry of Interior that their administrators are responsible for reporting the groups for calls for violence and hate speech, but considering that we know the content of those pages and deny the allegations made by press secretary Kotevski, we wonder how your administrators confirm those allegations before you delete the pages. Do you confirm them at all?
The systematic deletion especially of events that bring people together in peaceful protests adds significantly to the climate of fear created by those we are protesting against, so we felt compelled to explain a few things which we hope you will take into consideration next time you receive a request from the Macedonian Ministry of Interior to kill one of our events or pages. We will try to explain in brief the background of the protests, as well as the nature of the protests with the hope that someone out there will realize how detrimental your policies are for our peaceful, non-violent cause.
Background:
In the early hours of June 6th, shortly after midnight, a 22-year-old boy was beaten to death on the main square in Skopje in front of hundreds of bystanders. Witnesses who were there believed that the perpetrator was a member of the special police forces, but found no evidence of it in the media the next morning. In fact, the only story that was published the next day by a Macedonian news agency merely reinstated what the Ministry of Interior had published in their morning brief: that a young man started feeling sick on the main square the night before and passed away shortly after.
The outraged witnesses and their friends called for a protest to demand more information. The first day was marked with confusion, as the boy’s identity had not been confirmed and no one was coming out with official statements, other than to say that they have no information on the case. Fortunately, enough people had come out on the streets that first day, in peaceful protest, to demand more information, so that more than 40 hours after the killing occurred, the police were left with no other choice than to admit it was one of their own who committed the crime.
The Protests:
The public outrage that followed the official confirmation from the Ministry of Interior helped the protest that occurred on the first day gain momentum. More people came out the next day and even more the next, culminating in a 5000 strong protest a few days later. We have now been walking and blocking the streets of Skopje for 11 days straight and have no intention of backing down until our demands are met. The protest has since turned into a massive protest against police brutality, marked above all by a peaceful, non-violent stance. Which brings us back to our original question: why are our pages and events being deleted? And why has no one in your camp bothered to check the facts before approving requests made by the Ministry of Interior – the same people we are protesting against? The Republic of Macedonia is by no means the best functioning democracy in the world, but we are a democracy nonetheless, and our people still have the right to peaceful protests. In these past 10 days police officers have been walking the city side by side with us, helping us exercise our constitutional rights. Our protests are not violent and we do not use hate speech, and yet our events and pages are still deleted. They are deleted after we have proven time and again that we CAN be peaceful, after various local and international news agencies have covered the protests, mostly in praise of the power of the people. Our protests have been legitimized by locals and foreigners alike, legitimized even by those we are protesting against, as evidenced by the fact that the Ministry of Interior has taken the time to respond (poorly, we have to add) to our demands.
If everyone has legitimized our protests, facebook, why haven’t you?
As a gesture of good will, we have decided to add descriptions in English to our events to make your decisions easier for you. We urge you also to get more informed on our protests (I have added a number of links from credible news sources that confirm what is stated in this letter) and demand that our pages and events are left intact from this moment onwards. I can additionally confirm that the administrators of our pages and events have been very thorough in dealing with any posts or comments that violate the code of non-violence adopted by the protesters, which is a practice that we will continue to employ. By doing so, we are compliant with the provisions from the contract in which we have entered with you as individual facebook users. If there are any violations that we are committing unaware, we would appreciate additional information on what these are and they will be addressed immediately. If not, then let us be and let us plan peaceful protests uninterrupted by those who are powerless on the ground and have been using you to do what they cannot.
No, I'd really like to hear why the page was taken down, if indeed it was. Facebook doesn't make a habit of taking down pages at the request of minor governments unless there's some reasoning behind it. Certainly not repeatedly. So... I'm guessing there's something that these dudes aren't telling us.
You're assuming Facebook is actively complying with the request of someone's government here, minor or not. I'm betting there's a simpler explanation: there's probably a fast-track mechanism for taking down pages; you request it and it's done.
There's a limit to how much you can trust trusts. Political dissent is beyond that point. Yet again, we have a demonstration of the need for something like the FreedomBox. http://freedomboxfoundation.org/
FWIW, I've asked the poster for details which would allow us to investigate what happened, eg which pages, events, and users were allegedly taken down. As it stands there's not a whole lot to go on.
On a personal note, I'm astonished at how many people on this thread are interpreting this in the worst possible light. My coworkers and I are not superhuman.
That's so blindingly obvious that it makes one wonder about the motivation behind posting it. My current assumption is sheer trollery, but I'll reply anyway.
Yes, it's true that no laws were broken. The fact that Facebook is a corporation doesn't make them exempt from moral and ethical expectations people have. For example, if a large corporation finds a loophole in some law and exploits it to detriment of a significant number of people, you would get similar outcry from those people as we're getting from Macedonians right now.
In short, a blindingly obvious reply to a blindingly obvious statement: Just because no law was broken, it doesn't make what Facebook did good or right.
And yet, people still complain about "how could they do this? oh, the humanity!"
Which is obviously human nature. But no less annoying than my response.
So, do something about it being obvious. Advocate for a change. Instead of yelling "how could they do this?!", yell "We will make them change the policy and here's how and here's why!"
Then you've got something worth responding to in a public debate.
In which case it's odd that they would actively start deleting pages for some relatively minor (5000 people? Who cares?) protest movement going on there.
So I still think we're missing an important part of this story somewhere.
Unless this open letter gets a very significant amount of media coverage, facebook isn't going to do jack to help any of their users out when the user's government doesn't doesn't want facebook to. Facebook has become big enough that they're scared of what rocking the boat, even the tiniest bit, will do to their buisness opportunities.
People, I think it's time we collectively stopped this onlook of the middle eastern spring as "those brave people" and started pressuring our "leaders" to take a more proactive and progressive stance about their resources to do good for those nations that deserve better.
With this letter the collective consciousness of middle eastern culture thats looking for a better way of life just placed it's hand on the pulse of what is for many people in America, THE way to communicate.
