and what is the problem with that?
"Single guy made a good looking and so far working product in only 59 commits since september" is a different way to present the same facts.
Honestly, I also took it as throwing shade. I had to read the whole thing and realised that GP clearly wasn't throwing shade.
I am wondering why I initially thought that. Maybe a mindset of inherently better software created by Teams that's instilled within us these days could be a part of it. Trusting a lone programmer, it's harder because you have to reject the "programming".
I think it's because of several points that can be interpreted as good or bad:
- "relatively new project" > code is fresh and certainly well-organized / maybe lacks stability
- "all by one person" > a single vision is a good thing / if that person gives up the project, it's dead
- "no other project mentions it" > [no good aspect in that] / no real-world usage
If you have any experience in the frontend field, those points are more often bad than good. You don't want to invest time and/or money in that kind of project that has a high chance of being dead within a year.
Now, that does not mean that it's a bad project (it looks pretty good actually), but it's just very young.
Edit: actually I like this framework very much (but I have a thing for underdogs). It might be ideal to quickly throw POCs or toy projects
