Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


Because it’s fun? Because they just felt like it?

Why are people wasting their time watching movies, reading books or doing literally anything that doesn’t create immediate value?

Beside all of that, the reason given is an extremely good one. The official server deployment suggests you should have multiple GB of free RAM for it. Bitwarden_rs uses orders of magnitude less. Right now it's sitting at 20MB on my server.


I run Bitwarden official on a Hetzner dedicated box, the machine costs ~40€ a month, Bitwarden usage does not even register as statistical error, therefore resource consumption is really not such a concern.

There's really no objective reason to use bitwarden_rs. Subjectively - we can do whatever we like, I'm not trying to challenge anyone into providing their reasons or into justifying their decisions, there's no right or wrong here.


Interesting. I haven't tried running the official server, I just went by what they list on their website [1]. It says "Minimum 2GB", "Recommended 4GB". To me this suggested massive resource consumption: my server with a bunch of services including bitwarden_rs running uses just about 1GB.

[1] https://bitwarden.com/help/article/install-on-premise/


The official server is a cluster of microservices including MS-SQL of all things — bitwarden_rs is a single self-contained service which Just Works


You answered your question yourself. Not everybody has a business-grade server rack at home (bit of an hyperbole but you get the point).

"Why are people wasting their time rebuilding things that already exists ?" This is very subjective. There are many people (like me) who use bitwarden_rs for exactly the reasons it was created (low memory usage, etc.) so it definitely wasn't a waste of time.


Because sometimes people do things just because they can. Not every programming project needs to make sense.


Unfortunately fragmenting the opensource ecosystem with too many implementations harms it.


People don't always give a fuck about the "opensource ecosystem", they just want to program something they find fun...


Unfortunately a lot of people don't give fucks about others.

Publishing a weekend fun project on github and taking contributors away from from other projects is not always nice.

If it's just a "fun project" put a clear warning that it's not meant to be trusted, used, contributed to.

Github, by design, defaults to showing issue trackers & so on, giving the impression that a project is "real".

Then you go looking for something to use and find 100 half alive projects instead of 2 good ones.


Whatever happened to opinions of people, likes and interests. So what if its fragmented? Isn't forking a crucial thing in open-source anyone can build and support whatever the fuck the want. There are thousands of other tech forums why do we need hacker news to fragment tech community.


>Then you go looking for something to use and find 100 half alive projects instead of 2 good ones.

That can be solved with curation. Where are the curating organizations/websites?


I feel the same way about ice cream. Why are there 8 different types of vanilla ice cream, including 4 from the same brand? French Vanilla, Canadian Vanilla, Vanilla Bean, Double Churned Vanilla, 3 different plain Vanilla.

This harms the ice cream ecosystem.


Absurd comparison.


No it doesn't. People are free to pick the best implementation to suit their needs.


When all implementations are half-assed and none of them do it properly. However they have plenty of flamewars and ideological arguments #LinixDesktop




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: