I'll respond in good faith, but your tone sounds like you're just low-key dissing me.
He originally wrote it in Rust and solved some of his problems when he rewrote it in Zig in a different architecture. The same architecture in Rust would have solved the same problems.
And no, I would not call your second paragraph a fair take.
Yup, and this phenomenon has a popular name called 'Rewrite it in Rust' Not sure though, that it has a positive connotation.
> Just seems like the same lack-of-feature/"simple" stockholm syndrome from Go. To each their own.
Huh, I'd say another Rust fanboy obsessed with feature list than working software. You would call it a fair take, right?