Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I don’t equivocate visiting another planet or planets with saving the human species.

All it takes is one big, unlucky rock hurlting through space hitting this singular planet of ours, and we're gone like the dinosaurs. Eggs in one basket, and all that.




That is a threat, but the time when humans can survive away from a destroyed Earth is so long away that I don’t understand how a fail fast attitude helps.


It wouldn't be that far off if we had the money and motivation.

We could probably have a mostly self sustaining colony in caves on Mars within ten years , if we really wanted to. It would just take an absurd amount of money and singular focus and dedication by governments and companies.


> We could probably have a mostly self sustaining colony in caves on Mars within ten years

Even if that's true (which I highly doubt), a "mostly" self-sustaining colony won't last long if a catastrophe cripples human life on Earth.


> so long away

Even if it'll take 500 years to achieve, which seems longer than realistic, that's still the blink of an eye on a cosmic timescale.

A comet or asteroid could hit us at any moment and cause our extinction. That's one example of a planet-specific existential risk.

Diversifying life across multiple planets would make it much more likely that we'd survive as a species if something like this happened.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: