Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This lacks nuance. You ignore the effect they have on the ecosystem as a whole. Mentioning the "Go community" and their "agreement" of Google's decisions without acknowledging this is disingenuous at best. They have already swayed and gatekept large swaths of the (web)development "community" by their decade-long dominance and no one can make an impactful, meaningful decision in that field without their implicit approval. Their dominance is felt best by the way they control the conversation i.e. what we don't talk about - i.e. the web among other things they touch sucks, continues to suck and it is going to get worse and less free and they are significant negative contributers. So yeah, I'd rather see them cut into pieces.


Your comment lacks any content. You make vague claims of "effect on the ecosystem" without mentioning what that is. Give an example. Can people not create web frameworks? Can people not create products hosted on the web? Can people not use AWS or Azure for all their computing needs?

You can't just claim "everything they touch sucks" without a single example or evidence to back it up. You look like a hater.


Whoa, please don't post in the flamewar style to HN and please don't cross into personal attack. Those things aren't allowed here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


[flagged]


> The pro-Googlers are out in force today

This is a good way to categorically dismiss everyone with an opposing view, without the work of actually coming up with an argument.


A lot of people here aren't necessarily pro-Googlers, but rather open-source contributors who want to secure a future for themselves. That's not a bad thing, and Google's partnership with open-source has been mostly benevolent. People are quick to point to the "killed by Google" argument, but how is Google going to kill an open project? If they stop funding it and nobody takes up the mantle of maintaining it, maybe it's not actually that useful anyways. In either case, you still have the option to maintain the code yourself.


Thanks for the ad hominem attack. FYI, I have no google stock, never worked for google, have never contributed to a google open source project. If they’re supposed to be paying me for pointing out common sense on this thread ... they’re late on their payment.


> Thanks for the ad hominem attack. FYI, I have no google stock, never worked for google, have never contributed to a google open source project. If they’re supposed to be paying me for pointing out common sense on this thread ... they’re late on their payment.

If this is true (I doubt it) it is even sadder


Please don't break the HN guidelines like this. We're trying for something quite different here.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: