Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They're paying money to a trusted authority for preferential treatment on a literal registered trademark, in such a way to try and poach customers.

It's legal, but I don't understand why. The broader discussion point is why we do this to ourselves.



"Under U.S. law, use of a competitor's trademark in accurate and non-deceptive comparative advertising is legal and does not constitute trademark infringement" [1]

Which shows that it is a fairly grey area. "Fair use" doctrines apply to trademark infringement and using your competitor's name in this way has in the past been allowed.

[1] https://corporate.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/ours-wor...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: