Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They want to mimic the office as much as possible, that's really all the argument tends to boil down to.

Some will claim it is for charisma --> sorry, no amount of charisma is going to fix a bad cam and bad audio.

Some will claim it is more productive --> I really only need to hear your words or see your screenshare, your face moving in front of my screen is distracting.

Some will claim it is more natural --> Try looking at a whiteboard while everyone stares at you from the front. That's about what happens when you use videochat in important meetings. I don't think that's the way people used to have meetings.

Some will claim it is to read body language --> Don't depend on body language and stop assuming things from audio alone. We're adults. People will tell you when something is up.

The only argument I can't go against is bonding. But if you don't want to bond with your team past business-only, that argument is voided.

And I haven't named the cons yet. One of my pet peeves being people will start calling you over every single thing, make you repeat yourself often, misunderstand or even forget what was said in 10 minutes. You don't have that problem with asynchronous communication, and it also yanks the callee away from their flow.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: