> Who is we? Is it epidemiologists? Because I think they would disagree with you.
So basically, people who agree with you are “epidemiologists”, and people who show you facts you don’t like are “anti-science”.
What’s infuriating is when someone can post a well-sourced, factual comment, and it gets rejected by people who dismiss any and all facts that don’t fit their pre-determined narrative.
So basically, people who agree with you are “epidemiologists”, and people who show you facts you don’t like are “anti-science”.
What’s infuriating is when someone can post a well-sourced, factual comment, and it gets rejected by people who dismiss any and all facts that don’t fit their pre-determined narrative.