I'll be starting a PhD soon and would love to use a pandoc-based workflow (with MD or another format) for the gross of my writing.
How did you all structure the commenting on your writing?
I find converting to odt/doc before sending, managing all the exported versions with comments etc. becomes quite tedious. But I'm a bit reluctant to force my supervisors to use eg. git+criticmarkup[1]. I would love to hear you experiences!
- In my case, my supervisors mostly had handwritten notes which rendered that point a bit moot. However, when I send the almost-complete draft to a professional copy editor, it was indeed a pain to add the comments. Either handwritten+scanned, as acrobat comments, or word comments, they had to be manually input into the markdown file.
- Everything else worked relatively better. It was a bit tedious to type loooong pandoc commands "pandoc --filter=... etc etc" so I recently coded pandocmk [1] to make my life easier. It's not super well documented (but it's a quite short script, so readable), but the idea is that you type the command line options as metadata at the top.
How did you all structure the commenting on your writing? I find converting to odt/doc before sending, managing all the exported versions with comments etc. becomes quite tedious. But I'm a bit reluctant to force my supervisors to use eg. git+criticmarkup[1]. I would love to hear you experiences!
[1]: http://criticmarkup.com