Google is a client of the Pinkertons, a very old union busting company with a history of brutal tactics [0]. One of their employees was recently charged in a murder during riots in Denver [1].

[0] https://newrepublic.com/article/147619/pinkertons-still-neve... [1] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/juliareinstein/security...

That is factually incorrect regarding the the classification of the aforementioned person as an employee of Pinkerton’s.

Pinkerton sub-contracted this person.

My apologies, thanks for correcting me.

It’s not really the same organization anymore; they got bought by Securitas in 1999.

My statement isn't irresponsible. Corporations are universally amoral. If it was in Google's interests to do it, they would. But I think that, right now, those interests don't exist.

That being said, someone that is in that situation, if the stakes are high enough, might be dissuaded just knowing that such things happen.

People make decisions. At some point, all corporate decisions go through people.

Would you (reader) want to bet your life against a conference room full of people with $1M+ worth of stock options you're about to negatively impact? Where a bad outcome for you only requires their silence?

There are many people in the world who value morals over money. There are a few who value morals over lots of money. But that's not a bet I'd take.

Me neither. It's a very small likelihood, but I highly value my life. Just knowing about that possibility would chill me to the bone.