If all the emails and such are fake, are you saying it’s a better strategy to just not comment on it versus just releasing a statement that it’s all fabricated (because you know it is)?
Seems like a strong denial would go much further here.
> > are you saying it’s a better strategy to just not comment on it
> Yes.
> > Seems like a strong denial would go much further here.
> "But he would say that, wouldn't he? Why would he deny it if it was fake?"
That would be much easier to verify in that case. It seems more that the biden admin knows that any refutation of the content of the emails would backfire when they are proven to be true. In that case claiming ignorance is the correct nice.
I think it pretty much doesn't matter what he says or does - people will believe the angle they believe and that's presumably what the people behind this are hoping will carry for three weeks until election night.
Seems like a strong denial would go much further here.