Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Schwartz's beliefs and statements don't apply. Schwartz didn't write the controlling law.



Schwartz's was the CEO of the company that held the "copyright" should one exist at the time of the alleged "infringement"

Thus Schwartz's beliefs are and should be relevant


But, Oracle isn't Schwartz. Swartz isn't suing.


Under what legal basis?


Estoppel was mentioned elsethread.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: