Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The board is unlikely to agree to give a CEO or board member enough stock to maintain control of the company. I don't even think this is an unintentional goal - most wealth tax proponents I've seen are explicitly trying to prevent situations like with Cargill or Walmart, where the founder and his descendants can control the company forever.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: