> Driving on one side of the road offers no obvious benefits compared to driving on the other side
If that were true, then why did Sweden go to the trouble to change in 1967?
The fact that they did so, and that doing so was to improve interoperability with neighboring systems, might give you some clue why getting rid of CSS and HTML requires more than mere 'obvious benefits' to justify it.
You’re being deliberately obtuse. Driving on some side of the road offers no benefit, other than historical concerns arising from one’s neighbors decisions, and likewise with CSS. I’m sure you were aware of this and I’m not sure why you bothered to raise such a pedantic and worthless point.
If that were true, then why did Sweden go to the trouble to change in 1967?
The fact that they did so, and that doing so was to improve interoperability with neighboring systems, might give you some clue why getting rid of CSS and HTML requires more than mere 'obvious benefits' to justify it.